Certified Professional in Health Care Risk Management (CPHRM) Practice Exam 2025 - Free CPHRM Practice Questions and Study Guide

The necessary condition for proving battery revolves around the concept of harmful contact without consent. Battery is defined in legal terms as the intentional act of causing harmful or offensive contact with another person. For an act to be considered battery, there must be an element of contact that is both unpermitted by the individual affected and harmful in nature.

In this context, "harmful contact" refers to any physical interaction that results in injury or offense to the victim. The "without consent" part is crucial; it emphasizes that the contact must occur against the will of the individual. If the person did not give permission for such contact to occur, it meets the threshold for battery. This condition underpins many legal standards concerning personal injury and bodily autonomy.

The other conditions mentioned do not align with the principles of battery. For instance, unintentional harm does not constitute battery because the act must involve intent. A verbal agreement of consent is significant, but it implies that permission was given, which negates the potential claim of battery. Lastly, the assertion of no physical contact is contrary to the very definition of battery, as battery inherently involves some form of physical interaction. Thus, the definition and requirements for proof of battery hinge on harmful contact executed without the victim